|
Indiana Annexation Law is Un-American
Mayors of Indiana have the power to annex their neighbors
and this process is totally in contrast to the basic principles upon which the United States was founded.
Based on this
concern, The Indiana General Assembly directed the Indiana Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental
Relations to conduct a study of annexation.
The Described Annexation Debate
-
property owners
and residents, resentful of actions by officials they did not elect, and
opposed to increases in taxes, remonstrate, litigate, and organize politically
to stop annexations or change annexation law.
-
County and
township officials, concerned about loss of tax base and changes in rural ways
of life, question the annexation law and cooperate with citizens, although they
do not lead annexation battles.
-
Municipal
officials, exercising the discretion vested in them by their electorate and the
authority given them by the General Assembly, vote to annex territory in order
to provide services, manage growth, and enhance the well being of the cities
and towns they serve.
Municipal officials
want to retain their authority to annex property---- Property owners want to
change the annexation law to make annexation contingent upon the approval of
the property owners to be annexed either through referendum or
petition-----County and Township officials want to maintain rural character of
their communities and support their residents.
The new Annexation
Statutes passed by the General Assemble made Annexation slightly more difficult
for Municipalities to annex property but stopped short of self determination.
The City of Carmel
having lost their case in The Hamilton County Superior Court, have requested
and been granted; the case to be transferred to the Indiana State Supreme
Court.
It is imperative that
we prevail, to preserve the property owners right to continue to seek
modification of the Indiana Annexation Statutes.
Please support the
Southwest Clay Community Association in its efforts!!
|